College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Legalizing hemp

Correcting history’s mistake benefits Oregon’s agricultural industry

By Ben Lundin

Vanguard staff

Print this article

Published: Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Legalize hemp

Illustration by Kira Meyrick

Legalize hemp

Gov. Ted Kulongoski announced last week his intent to take pen in hand and make Oregon the seventh state to legalize the growing of hemp.

By signing into law Senate Bill 676, which allows farmers to grow hemp statewide and was passed by a veto-proof 27-2 margin, Kulongoski is among the few politicians taking small steps to reverse an agricultural mistake made 72 years ago.

Small steps, unfortunately, are the biggest ones Oregon lawmakers could take because hemp is still banned by federal law.

Oregon became the first Western state to legalize the growing of hemp since 1999, adding to a slowly building snowball of states that could eventually push the U.S. Legislature to remove the archaic and unnecessary ban.

Hemp growing was banned for all the wrong reasons seven decades ago. Its illegalization has a somewhat complicated history that was largely due to business considerations, rather than drug concerns, involving powerful figures of the time and some slick political maneuvering. Maneuvering that stripped away hemp and its benefits for most of the 20th century, long after America’s founding fathers, including George Washington, were known to cultivate the plant on their own land.

The short version, which is by no means the complete story, is this: Harry J. Anslinger, the first commissioner of the Treasury Department’s Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and William Randolph Hearst, a newspaper mogul, are largely to blame. Hearst owned hundreds of acres of timber. As hemp-based paper became more cost effective, the value of such land was threatened. Anslinger fueled anti-hemp propaganda that Hearst published in his newspapers. In 1937, Anslinger presented Congress with a ban against hemp and cannabis, which passed.

Unfortunately, some people—many of whom compose our federal Legislature—still believe hemp and marijuana are equally dangerous.

Hemp is a non-hallucinogenic variety of the cannabis sativa plant. You could smoke hemp for days and never feel anything more than throat irritation.

This is a shortsighted view of an agricultural plant that can be manufactured more cheaply and used for more products than many of the standard fibers used for clothing, rope, paper, food and other everyday objects.

America spends about $360 million per year importing hemp, according to the Eugene Register-Guard—money that could benefit local farmers, while the cheaper costs of local cultivation would translate into higher profits for local storeowners.

Opponents of decriminalization contend that it will increase marijuana growing on Oregon farms and thus heighten use of the drug in the region.

Oregon state Sen. Floyd Prozanski, a supporter of legalizing hemp since 1997, optimistically predicts the national ban will be lifted in about two years with increased pressure on the federal level. Politicians of traditionally conservative states aren’t likely to support the move, while political campaigns nationwide receive money from companies that would not like to see hemp’s competition in the marketplace.

Let’s hope Prozanski is right that change is coming. Let’s hope U.S. lawmakers will refuse to succumb to political pandering this time around and reverse a terrible mistake.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Your name
Mon Aug 10 2009 14:14
I am running a poll concerning my diploma thesis concerning the hemp question. This article finally explained me the current situation in US. I am so happy hemp is being allowed for growing in US. I live in Europe, where growing is legal for many years (in France has been never banned). I would be really happy for your opinions in my poll. That would really help me to make my research more international :)
Thanks a lot !!
Good luck with growing!!
KOtel
poll : www.konopicko.tk
Your name
Mon Aug 3 2009 16:23
Please Help Me BAN The petro BAG!

Thanks!!

PRESS RELEASE
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-plastic-pollutes-hemp-saves-lives-1249321639.html

Hemp paper requires less chemical processing and can be whitened without producing dioxins. Unlike wood pulp paper, hemp does not harden, yellow, or crack with age.

If hemp replaced cotton globally, the increased fiber yield would free up an area of farmland the size of Florida. The reduction in toxic pesticides would be 94,080 tons.

In the USA approximately 1.4 billion cotton t-shirts are sold annually. If they were replaced by hemp t-shirts the energy savings would be 3486 million GJ (that's the household power for one whole year for 92,300 people) and the water savings would be 1339 BILLION gallons (that would satisfy the household water consumption for more than half the population of the USA for ONE YEAR).

Hemp fabric is nature's most durable natural fiber. It is four times more durable than cotton, and is naturally UV resistant, offering more protection than other natural fibers.

Hemp can be used to produce 25,000 - 50,000 kinds of domestic and industrial products, including paper products of all kinds, efficient biofuels, biodegradable plastics, food, non-toxic building materials such as fibreboard, paints, and linoleum.

Plastic was originally invented using natural plant cellulose, which was then replaced by petroleum products. Hemp has the highest level of natural cellulose. Hemp fiberboard is stronger than fiberboard made of wood products.

Twenty U.S. states are researching and Six States have PASSED HEMP legislation to legalize industrial hemp. Canada legalized hemp cultivation in 1994 and is quickly becoming the global leader in hemp research and product development.

Hemp is Thirty Thousand Strong product incubator, with proper processing and marketing, such as with cotton, there is no way to lose on this money crop.

Brandan B
Thu Jul 30 2009 10:34
This is a step in the right direction for Oregon. The one thing missing from this article is that hemp paper production is much less expensive than standard wood pulp because of the natural adhesive qualities in hemp's cellulose. No need for chemical adhesives!!
John Q. Public
Wed Jul 29 2009 18:48
Looks like somebody has been reading Jack Herer or Jack Herer inspired writings from hemp cheerleaders. Hemp is legal in most industrialized nations now. It ought to be legal here too, but don't believe all the conspiracy theories as to why it isn't legal. It's not legal because our government doesn't want to legalize pot and they see the hemp movement as just another sneaky push to legalize marijuana for all purposes, kind of like the way they view medical marijuana.

If you look on the Net you'll see all sorts of hemp cheerleading. Some people think it will save the world, replace oil and all petroleum based products and wood pulp for paper and so on. Before you jump on that badwagon take a look at the worldwide hemp industry. We have big growers like Russia and China and India. It's produced in something like 40 countries now. None are using it to produce biofuels though because their are better feedstocks that produce a lot more fuel per acre. None have replaced wood pulp with hemp in paper either. If you buy hemp paper chances are what you'll get is some overpriced wood pulp based paper with a few strands of hemp in it. In fact, hemp is actually used mainly in novelty type products.

Hemp is grown in Canada. They don't grow it for fiber though, only for seed. There are very few places where it is grown for fiber. Why? Because it's super labor intensive and expensive to take hemp stalks and turn them into usable fiber. It is only done where labor costs are dirt cheap. If hemp was legal here we'd still be importing our hemp textiles because it would be no more cost effective for us to process hemp fiber than it is in other Western nations with high labor costs that grow hemp. We'd probably just be growing it for seed like the Canadians.

When Canada first legalized hemp a lot of eager farmers jumped in hoping to get rich off the "wonderplant." They overproduced and drove prices down in the limited market for hemp and a lot of them lost their shirts. Hemp production actually went down in Canada. Hemp production dropped off a lot in other countries as well. There are countries in Europe where they actually have to subsidize the "wonderplant." It's just not all it's hyped to be.

I'm all for legalizing hemp though. I'm all for legalizing marijuana and regulating it like alcohol. Then we'd probably find uses for the parts of the plants people aren't smoking. Companies like Monsanto would be engineering dual use plants, high test hemp.

If we do just legalize hemp, don't expect the industry to just take off. It hasn't done that anywhere else in the world. It's a pretty modest industry and demand for hemp is limited. Many farmers here would probably find it to be a useful crop that they can make a few bucks from, but if they grow too much they'll flood the limited market and drive prices so low that they'll lose money.

Legalize Pot
Wed Jul 29 2009 13:11
Legalize, tax, educate, treat like alcohol, end drug war and violence created by it, cripple drug cartels






log out