College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

New campus smoking policy unveiled

Survey from 2006 helped guide comprehensive changes to policy

By Halley Connelly

Vanguard Staff

|

Published: Friday, March 6, 2009

Updated: Friday, March 6, 2009

Portland State will implement its new smoking policy March 30. This policy may not seem too different on paper, but in the Park Blocks it should be a breath of fresh air.

Gwyn Ashcom, chair of the Tobacco Policy Committee (a sub-committee of the Portland State Safety Committee) and outreach coordinator for the Center for Student Health and Counseling, led the way in drafting the detailed proposal.

It involved a long process of surveying individuals at the university, as well as researching common restriction policies at other institutions.

“We really wanted to make this process as transparent and democratic as possible,” Ashcom said. “We wanted to involve the entire community … it took quite a bit of time.”

The survey was sent out campus-wide in 2006, and garnered a big response. Approximately 70 percent of returned surveys were from students, with the rest from faculty and staff.

Also covered were issues such as secondhand smoke, and whether or not PSU should become completely smoke free.

The new policy is does not ban smoking, but does restrict the areas on campus in which individuals can smoke. The policy requires smoking to take place at least 25 feet from doorways, open-air intakes, vents and operable windows. This policy may prove difficult to enforce in downtown Portland.

“Being an urban institution we obviously have city streets that run through the campus, as well as the city-owned Park Blocks,” Ashcom said. “So there are areas we don’t have control over.”

The increased distance requirement makes PSU eligible for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) status, an environmental building rating system, which will aid in the university’s already green-friendly reputation.

As part of the distance rule, the committee decided that the walkways between buildings should be no exception. Areas such as the sky bridges between the Smith Memorial Student Union and Cramer Hall have been popular for a quick smoke, and also cause for student complaints.

“That was one of the big areas that came up during the course of the study,” Ashcom Said. “It creates a lot of smoke that can easily enter the buildings.”

Many complaints from the committee’s survey were also aimed at the area in front of the Millar Library, a common rain-free haven for smokers.

As for enforcement of these changes, the responsibility has been handed off to the Community Outreach Officers from Campus Public Safety. These officers will be handing out information cards about the policies and designated smoking areas in hopes to “encourage compliance.”

“It’s really protecting the people who choose not to smoke from smoke exposure. It’s not to punish smokers in any way. That’s not the way we approached this,” Ashcom said.

The policy has also officially banned the advertising and sale of tobacco products on campus. Ashcom found during her research last year that Portland State was the last state school in Oregon to still have tobacco sold on campus.

“It wasn’t something that was advertised at the time. You had to really know it was there,” she said.

Further down the road, the opening of the new Recreation Center will coincide with the Urban Plaza becoming a smoke-free zone. This policy will be implemented in January of 2010 and is intended to give the image of a health-minded place for students to be comfortable outside.

“Students [feel] there is no outdoor space that is free of smoke of all kinds,” Ashcom said. “It just makes sense to have that open area be smoke free.”

Becoming completely smoke free may be out of the question given Portland State’s urban setting, but the Urban Plaza’s cessation plan will serve as a trial run, and the committee plans to conduct further studies after the policy takes effect.

For students interested in reading the complete policy or contacting the Tobacco Policy Committee, more information can be found at the PSU Safety Committee’s Web site: www.safetycommittee.pdx.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Sarah
Tue Mar 17 2009 13:23
Smokers don't want to intentionally hurt anyone else with their deadly habit but they DO when they smoke in public, confined areas. If the school is taking a step towards limiting smoking in places, they NEED to create covered areas where smokers can smoke freely. Also if they are even addressing this smoking issue, they should provide free or reduced cost smoking cessation products or hypnotherapy at SHAC. If the school brings this issue up, they need to follow through with help for smokers who want to quit and places for smokers who don't want to quit.
Silence D
Fri Mar 13 2009 17:17
Protect Us, why should the smoker have to walk blocks to smoke in a "legal" space?
If smoking is going to be banned on campus then shelters for smokers need to be created, that simple. It's easy to complain as a smoker and as a non-smoker, its hard to find a common ground (which ultimately is going to have to be the solution...unless of course we just ban smoking all together)
Victoria G. concerned PSU student
Wed Mar 11 2009 17:55
I'm not aware of anyone ever dying from standing next to an ugly person or breathing next to an overweight person that is drinking full fat Lattes. I am however aware of the 53,800 people that die each year from second hand smoke exposure, as reported in the 1997 California EPA Report on Secondhand Smoke. Additionally, the 2006 Surgeon General's Report on The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke confirmed the known health effects of secondhand smoke exposure, including immediate adverse effects on the cardiovascular system, and coronary heart disease and lung cancer. The report concluded that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke and that establishing smokefree environments is the only proven way to prevent exposure.
Coalition for the Banning of Ugly People
Tue Mar 10 2009 19:01
You're right, Protect Us! We should ban people from doing what they want to do in a public space! And while we're at it, we need to stop these ugly people I see all the time, marring our landscape. I mean my god, is it too much to ask that someone put on some lipstick or god FORBID, run a comb through their hair?

Every day it seems like I see more ugly, poorly dressed students attending classes at PSU. They have no right to make our campus a less beautiful place to be, and they should have some respect for their fellow students. I should not have to close my eyes and grope around for my classroom just to shut these ugly people out!!

Who's with me!? First smoking, THEN THE UGLY PEOPLE! After we win those fights, we can take on the REAL social plagues, like People Who Talk Too Loudly On Cell Phones and People Who Order Full Fat Lattes When Really They Could Stand to Lose A Few Pounds and Should Have Ordered 1% Milk Instead.

Protect Us
Tue Mar 10 2009 18:42
Why should I have to move around the smoker, hold my breath and not be able to breathe clean air when someone is smoking? I want to live, learn and enjoy life, and 2nd hand smoke interferes with that! It hurts me and everyone else that breaths it. We need better policies that will protect us from the harmful effects of 2nd hand smoke and this one is a step in the right direction.
Silence D
Fri Mar 6 2009 16:32
As a former smoker I understand both sides of the debate. Other than the obvious health problems, breathing in second hand smoke can be extremely bothersome for non-smokers. I understand the "rights" of non-smokers but smokers also need some amount of consideration. The more you push them out of buildings and walk ways, the more you need to create covered smoking areas.

As for banning smoking in the Urban Center (modeled after the Pioneer Square ban) - ridiculous! Any public open air space should not be limited in use. So now we are going to push workers of Seattles Best, Rice Junkies, etc. who smoke across the street? Really? Is that totally necessary?

Smoking in confined walkways, near doors/windows/ventilation is not okay. But smoking in an open air area is perfectly okay and anybody who complains has taken it too far, you are free to move around the smoker if it bothers you so much.







log out