College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Freedom of degradation

What's the difference between stripping and prostitution?

Vanguard staff

Published: Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Last year, ABC News reported that Portland tops the nation in the number of strip clubs where full nudity, alcohol and video gambling are allowed within a single establishment. And that number appears to still be growing.

According to KGW, the Mynt Gentleman’s Club in Portland’s Laurelhurst neighborhood was granted a liquor license by a vote of four to one from the Oregon Liquor Control Commission, despite arguments from many neighborhood residents who did not find the strip club to be appropriate for their area.

But what is so bad about stripping?

There are people in this world who think that stripping is a personal choice and that women or men who strip should do whatever they feel is right for them. There are also people who think that stripping is not just entertainment but is in fact a form of prostitution.

It may not be sex, but it is payment for stripping. Is that not simple compensation in return for a sexual act? Something people forget is the sexual aspect of strip clubs. If dancing nude was the true aspect of stripping, then perhaps it could be entertainment, but dancing nude on the stage often includes sex acts that are done to arouse sexual desire in the customer.

Why do you think striptease workout videos such as Carmen Electra’s Aerobic Striptease or the Exotic Dance Workout DVDs come out so that women can learn the same moves as a stripper but perform them on their partner in the privacy of their own home? The lap and private dances that are taught on the DVDs are the same sexually explicit moves performed naked onstage in front of many people. These dances are meant to make contact between the stripper and the customer, whether it is by having breasts in the face or body of the customer, or something even more sexual.

As many people forget about such sexual aspects of stripping, this also leads to sexual harassment for almost every stripper in one point of their career. According to The Freedom and Justice Center for Prostitution Resources, “strippers are not entitled to file discrimination claims, receive workers’ compensation or unemployment benefits. Club owners are free from tax obligations and tort liability. Owners pay no Social Security taxes, no health insurance and no sick pay. Some club owners require strippers to sign agreements indicating that they are working as independent contractors and many clubs require women to sign a waiver of their right to sue the club for any reason.”

Still not convinced?

A survey conducted by the same organization reported that “customers spit on women, spray beer and flick cigarettes at them. Strippers are pelted with ice, coins, trash, condoms, room keys, pornography and golf balls…customers often attempt and succeed at penetrating strippers vaginally and anally with their fingers, dollar bills and bottles. Customers expose their penises, rub their penises on women and masturbate in front of the women.”

What is even more bizarre is that the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that Oregon’s Constitution protects these kinds of live sex acts in strip clubs as “freedom of expression.”

Perhaps it is “freedom of expression,” but no one should forget that stripping is nearly the same as prostitution. Aside from being labeled a whore, stripping is degrading to women and men alike.

What is the difference between buying someone for sex and buying someone to give you sexual arousal?
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Anonymous
Sat Mar 27 2010 03:45
I'd have to agree with an author, if someone thinks that those girls are out there showing their private places just to "express" themselves and they are exercising their right for "freedom of expression" then you need to take off your pink glasses and look around. Any 9th grader would just smirk at this notion. Lap dances are not done on clients just to "express" yourself, it's more like "pay me $20 and you can watch me express myself all you want". So, yes, typical club striptease is certainly not an art form and not freedom of expression, it's just as usual, selling sex for money.
Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 07:45
so by your logic stripping equals prostitution.

so by using your same logic, if i go to a club buy a few drinks for a woman and i and we have sex, i have basically just paid for a whore.

your logic fails.

Dave
Thu Mar 4 2010 20:28
From your opening paragraph: "Last year, ABC News reported that Portland tops the nation in the number of strip clubs where full nudity, alcohol and video gambling are allowed within a single establishment. And that number appears to still be growing."

You should have stopped there. That is something Oregon should be proud of. That's freedom. The rest of your writing is nothing more than your bigoted persecution of people who heroically refuse to submit to your narrow minded insistence on rigid cultural conformity. The U.S. calls itself "the land of the free" while incarcerating more of its population than any other country in the world. I suggest the U.S. trade in some of its abundance of hypocrisy for a little tolerance. Quit outlawing everything and let some of those people out of prison.

The problem with Portland isn't strippers or hookers. It's busy bodies who aren't satisfied that they are free not to patronize establishments they don't approve of, but feel compelled to deny the option to everyone else.

StripandGrowRich
Thu Mar 4 2010 16:00
Although most strippers are not selling sex, the job is on the fringe of sex workers.

Although there are seedy clubs where things happen that legally shouldn't, most well run gentlemen's clubs do not allow explicit sex acts to occur on the premises. It is a multi billion dollar industry of which two major nightclub chains are now traded on the NASDAQ.

The most important tenet that we teach at Strip and Grow Rich is that stripping is a sales job. Exotic dancers sell their time and affection to customers. It has absolutely nothing to do with dancing.

Anonymous
Thu Mar 4 2010 15:40
"A survey conducted by the same organization reported that “customers spit on women, spray beer and flick cigarettes at them. Strippers are pelted with ice, coins, trash, condoms, room keys, pornography and golf balls…customers often attempt and succeed at penetrating strippers vaginally and anally with their fingers, dollar bills and bottles. Customers expose their penises, rub their penises on women and masturbate in front of the women.”

What is even more bizarre is that the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that Oregon’s Constitution protects these kinds of live sex acts in strip clubs as “freedom of expression.”

The insinuation in this passage of your editorial suggests that the Oregon Supreme Court protects unwanted sexual harrasment of perfomers by patrons. Perhaps it was just unwieldy writing. The decision by the court simply protected the ability of people working in adult entertainment to perform sex acts, but between performers, and not customers. Clearly, the abuse and violence the Freedom and Justice Center chronicles cannot be condoned,and laws exist to prevent unwanted harassment. (The coment that this treatment is simply a hazard of the job is wrong and mean-spirtied.) However an entirely differnt question is what concern is it of the government or prudes whether consenting (and non-violent) adults perform and view pulbic sex acts in businesses specifically created for those purposes?

As to the opinion piece writer's statement that "Something people forget is the sexual aspect of strip clubs," I wonder who these amnestic people are. Guarantted that the only -- and I mean only -- aspect the vast majority of folks relate to a strip club is a sexual one.

Troy
Wed Mar 3 2010 14:38
"What is the difference"? Well, at the most obvious level: penetration. :-P If you want a technical difference, stripping is legal in this state, whereas prostitution is not (wrongly, in my opinion, if done through their own free will). Dig deeper? It all depends on where you define your "levels" or draw your lines. If I look at a picture of a nude woman, did I perform a sexual act with her? What if I masturbate to that picture? Is it different if I see her nude in person, instead of a picture?

If you view stripping as degrading, then don't strip. If you have the talent and ability and will to do it, how is it degrading? Throwing of objects and breaking other rules is basically an occupational hazard that strippers are aware of. The less "seedy" your chosen work environment is, the less likely you are to run afoul of those risks. Construction workers are aware they can get electrocuted, fall down an unfinished elevator shaft, or hell, even get run over by a forklift... They still do it for the pay. Are those occupational hazards degrading them somehow? I don't think so. They're exercising their free will and their personal freedom, willingly undertaking the hazards of their chosen profession in exchange for pay. There's nothing degrading or immoral about that, in my opinion...

I can't say I would have expected a PSU student to provide a strong opinion AGAINST personal freedoms...

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In