College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

(Un)fix your bike

Fixed-speed bikes are unsafe and are just a fad

By Jesse Cronin

Print this article

Published: Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Updated: Sunday, November 29, 2009

Bicycles are all the rage for getting around Portland. There are many different types of bicycles that could be used: road bikes, mountain bikes, BMX bikes, 10-speed bikes, 24-speed bikes, one-speed bikes or fixed-speed bikes. However, this article only focuses on one of them: fixed-speed bicycles.

A fixed-speed bicycle is a bike that has the pedals and the wheels connected in such a manner that the wheel and the bicycle cannot turn on their own accord. When one turns, the other turns. There are no gears and usually no hand brakes. In order to stop, you have to stop the pedals from turning. Fixed-speed bikes were designed to be used on a velodrome.

A velodrome is essentially a racetrack. Recently, however, bikes designed for this have made their way onto the roads. Usually fixed-speed bikes don't have brakes, although some owners do opt to install them.

Stephen Regenold, writer of The Gear Junkie syndicated column, notes that when riding a fixed gear he gets a strange feeling of being more connected to the bike.

I don't buy it. It's a fashion statement and it's a dumb one. Who cares if people should be allowed to make fashion statements no matter how dumb, right? This leads to an interesting question: Are these bikes, which typically have no brakes, safe?

Did I mention that it's a dumb fad? For one, speeders, you either can't go that fast, have a hard time going up hills or both. Safety is a huge concern.

A few years ago I asked a PSU student who had a fixed gear about the safety of not having brakes and his reply was something to the effect of fixed-speed bikes are safer because the rider has more control of the bike.

Vincette Betette, a bike messenger in Washington, D.C., says that he doesn't think some people should ride these bikes. He believes a lot of people who switch over to this style of bike just go headlong into the backs of cars.

I can admit with my one experience in riding a fixed speed, I had a very difficult time stopping. Some proponents of no-brakes fixies believe that having a brake on a fixed-speed bike is like broadcasting the fact that you don't know how to ride a fixed speed and are a poseur.

Most will (or should) admit that having hand breaks make it easier to stop if a car cuts in front of you.

Sheldon Brown, bike expert and author of Adventure Cyclist, lists several hazards of riding a fixed-speed bike, include hitting your pedal on a turn an issue because you have to pedal through a turn, catching a finger or shoelace in the sprocket or chain, and catching a finger in the sprocket when trying to fix the bike.

The threat of these hazards may rise exponentially on a fixed speed if a person is not used to riding one. Betette also poses the question that if you ride your bike three blocks to get a case of beer and head back home, why do you need a fixed speed? According to The Washington Post, most people who started the fixed-speed trend were bike messengers that got tired of their bikes breaking all the time, so they removed all the unnecessary parts.

In other words, they did it for a practical purpose. That purpose is not applicable to the average rider; they use their bikes as a part of their job. Their bike is to them what a taxi is to cab driver. The average person riding a fixed speed is like driving a taxicab when you are not a cab driver. It's fine as long as it is your cab but you still look like an idiot.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

keospin
Sun Aug 16 2009 02:37
whoever wrote this crap hasn't rode fixed, he just says whats fed to him, and why do you have to hate? so what its a fad, doesn't mean you have to whine and bitch about it like a little kid... people these days are so ignorant
Mike
Fri May 22 2009 17:59
I think people are trying to miss the point, Really guys the Mac carrying, skinny-jean wearing crowd need to go back to the Electra Amsterdam that was so "in" 3 years ago. Now instead of aiming for Nerdy-cool they are riding Fixies. The problem is they aren't, by and large, bike people. Do you know how many broken chains you see at a LBS because of these guys? How many head-over-handle bar accidents? I live in a really hilly area and these retards are riding Fixies with no brakes (illegally), and since they can't pedal 300rpm, and aren't riding clipless they TAKE THEIR FEET OFF THE PEDALS! They "slow" by foot dragging!! At 35mph!! Banned? No... Raise there student health insurance rates, have LBS refuse to service the bikes....Hell Yes.
Mr. Velo
Tue Mar 10 2009 03:35
There is no way you can have more control over more rotating mass in a fixed gear bike. Stick to the mechanical advantage of traditional bicycle breaks and have a free willing single gear bike if you will.
a commonly held opinion.
Sun Mar 8 2009 01:22
This article was written by a second grader, right? Who writes this shit? Maybe you all should ask for more SFC funding. With the increased payroll you could pay someone to edit this incoherent babble. I for one am displeased that student fees in the amount of $221,000 support an operation run by monkeys with word processing skills, or lack thereof. Vanguard I am submitting your newspaper to the FAILBLOG. EPIC FAIL.
failblog.org
a-dillah
Fri Mar 6 2009 02:12
Fixed-gear, not fixed-speed. Seriously. You can go a variety of speeds on a fixed-gear bicycle. Yes, they should have brakes, no, they should not be banned from streets. In inclement conditions, a fixed gear often works better to slow you down than brakes. Just sayin'.
Aka
Fri Mar 6 2009 02:03
Your arguments are flawed I don't even know where to start. I can't even believe that paper has been published.






log out